Healthy Lifestyles Case Assignment
Healthy Lifestyles Case Assignment
Healthy Lifestyles Case Assignment
This Assignment expands upon the work you have been conducting for this week’s Discussion. For this Assignment (which you will start this week, and submit by the end of Week 7), you will conduct a search for literature on your selected practice problem. A Literature Review Matrix template will be used to identify gaps in the literature.
To prepare:
Consider the practice problem you addressed in this week’s Discussion. (You may select a new issue if necessary, but it is not recommended.)
Review the guidelines in the Literature Review Matrix, included in the Learning Resources. Formulate a research question around your issue as indicated in Part I. Then complete Part II of the Matrix, identifying the resources you will use, search terms and criteria, and Boolean search strings.
Using the Walden Library, locate 10 articles related to your research question. At least one article must be a systematic review. All of the articles should be primary sources. NOTE: If appropriate, you may use the four articles you reviewed for this week’s Discussion.
By Day 7 of Week 7
Complete Part I and Part II of the Literature Review Matrix template.
Begin working on Part III.
DISCUSSION:
Practice Problem: Healthy eating and healthy lifestyles to combat obesity and reduce chronic illnesses.
The literature strengthens the theoretical framework and the practical problem by providing evidence to the elements of self-efficacy. The articles explain the different ways in which self-efficacy plays a central role in analyzing changes in social behavior. Models included in the description of the theoretical framework strengthen the main points. Health Belief Model (HBM) was one of the first models that adapted theories from behavioral sciences to predict health behaviors: HBM explained health behavior in terms of several constructs: perceived susceptibility of the health problem, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and cues to action (McEwen & Wills, 2017). The practice problem is evident in statistical literature that shows the high number of people suffering from obesity and other chronic diseases. The article outlines the reasons that cause obesity and other chronic disorders concerning social behavior (Weld, 2008).
The three levels of evidence included in the articles that make up the literature are II, III, and IV. The articles focus om giving recommendations towards attaining a clinical solution for the problem. The most prevalent level of confidence is the IV because the literature considers options from the articles to conclude. The causes of obesity and chronic diseases rely on published theories and models as the source of evidence. Level IV type of proof refers to one that relies on researched and published literature to conclude (Stephens et al., 2015). The opinion of the audience counts in the identified theoretical framework and practical problem. Patient preference in this case of obesity and healthy living based on self-efficacy presents a substantial role that influences the model. In the article, SET provides a dietary behavior change aimed at reducing the number of obesity patients. The level II, III, and IV evidence provide recommendations concerning the results and barriers and employed in the social cognitive theory to influence dietary changes (Sook & Sohn, 2019).
In The systematic review article, peer-reviewed articles with dates of 2000 or higher were utilized for the study seeking participants 18 years or older who were searching to lose weight. After conducting the study, the article supported the self-efficacy theory. In practical and simple terms, enhancing confidence and competence about a given health behavior appears to be helpful in overcoming barriers – namely in initial stages of adoption – and is often the first step (Teixeria et al., 2019).
Sook, K. & Sohn, S. (2019). Emotional intelligence, problem solving ability, self-efficacy, and clinical performance among nursing students: A structural equation model. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 31(4), 380-388. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.7475/kja…
Stephens, T., Resinicow, K., Latimer-Sport, M., & Walker, L. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of dietary behavior among African Americans. American Journal of Health Education, 46(3), 174-181. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A…
Weld, K., Padden, D., Ramsey, G., & Bibb, S. (2008). A framework for guiding health literacy research in populations with universal access to healthcare. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(4), 308-318. Retrieved from Walden Library Database.
Teixeria, P. Carraca, E., Marques, M., Rutter, H., Oppert, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., … Brug, J. (2015). Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Medicine, 13, 84. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12….
References
McEwin, M. & Wills, E. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing. (5th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Sook, K. & Sohn, S. (2019). Emotional intelligence, problem solving ability, self-efficacy, and clinical performance among nursing students: A structural equation model. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 31(4), 380-388. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.7475/kja…
Stephens, T., Resinicow, K., Latimer-Sport, M., & Walker, L. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of dietary behavior among African Americans. American Journal of Health Education, 46(3), 174-181. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A…
Weld, K., Padden, D., Ramsey, G., & Bibb, S. (2008). A framework for guiding health literacy research in populations with universal access to healthcare. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(4), 308-318. Retrieved from Walden Library Database.
Teixeria, P. Carraca, E., Marques, M., Rutter, H., Oppert, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., … Brug, J. (2015). Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Medicine, 13, 84. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12…
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
- Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
- Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
- One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
- I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
- Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
- In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
- Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
- Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
- Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
- Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
- I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
- I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
- As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
- It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
- For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
- Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
- Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
- Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
- The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
- Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
- If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
- I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
- As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
- Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
- Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
- Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.