NSG6002 Week 2 Project Rubric DQ
NSG6002 Week 2 Project Rubric DQ
Identify specific legislative District State Governor, areas of focus and interest State Senators, committees and appointments
Student did not submit assignment
Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided.
Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague.
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NSG6002 Week 2 Project Rubric DQ
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment.
Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment.
/ 60
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
37 points
Satisfactory
43 points
Proficient
48 points
Exemplary
55 points
State Representatives (House), committees and appointments Federal Senators, committee and appointments
Student did not submit assignment
Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts.
/ 55
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
34 points
Satisfactory
39 points
Proficient
44 points
Exemplary
50 points
Federal Congressman (House), committees and appointments State Specific legislation involving legislators
Student did not submit assignment
Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses 1 credible resource in the assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource.
/ 50
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
6 points
Satisfactory
7 points
Proficient
8 points
Exemplary NSG6002 Week 2 Project Rubric DQ
10 points
Writing, grammar and APA application: Scholarly grammar, use of APA 6th edition formatting, use of headers and primary sources
Student did not submit assignment
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors.