Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper
Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper
| Trimester | T2 2018 |
| Unit Code | MN504 |
| Unit Title | Networked Application Management |
| Assessment
Type |
Group Assignment |
| Assessment
Title  Struggling to meet your deadline ?Get assistance on Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW! |
Network Analysis using Wireshark Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper |
| Purpose ofthe assessment (with ULO Mapping) | Thisassignmentisdesignedtodevelopdeeperanalyticalunderstandingof differentdistributednetworkconditions.Atthecompletionofthisassessment studentsshouldbeableto:
d. Analyseperformanceanddeploymentissuesfornetworkedapplications; e. Compare appropriate industry tools and techniques to manage networkedapplications; |
| Weight | 20% |
| Total Marks | 60 |
| Word limit | 2000 Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper |
| Due Date | 26/09/2018 11:55PM (Week 11 ) |
| Submission Guidelines | · AllworkmustbesubmittedonMoodlebytheduedatealongwithatitle Page.
· TheassignmentmustbeinMSWordformat,1.5spacing,11-ptCalibri(Body) fontand2.54cmmarginsonallfoursidesofyourpagewithappropriate sectionheadings. · Referencesourcesmustbecitedinthetextofthereport,andlisted appropriatelyattheendinareferencelistusingIEEEreferencingstyle. |
| Extension | Ifanextensionoftimetosubmitworkisrequired,aSpecialConsideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of theassignment. |
| Academic Misconduct | · AcademicMisconductisaseriousoffence.Dependingontheseriousnessof thecase,penaltiescanvaryfromawrittenwarningorzeromarkstoexclusion fromthecourseorrescindingthedegree.Studentsshouldmakethemselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at:Forfurtherinformation,pleaserefertotheAcademicIntegrity
Section in your Unit Description. |
Permalink:
Assignment Description
Theaimoftheassignmentistodevelopananalyticalunderstandingofperformanceandmanagementof differenttypesofnetworkedapplications.Theassignmentwillprovideanopportunitytounderstandnetwork performanceandmanagementissuesofnetworkedapplicationsusingstateofthearttools.Theseexercises provideanopportunitytodemonstrateanalyticalabilityofevaluatingdistributedsystemsperformance, QualityofServiceandservicemanagement.
Overview and General Instructions of Assignment
StudentsneedtoformagroupoftwointheirownlabclassandinformtutorabouttheirgroupduringWeek 7Lab.Eachgroupwillneedtocapturepacketsontheirhomenetworkandat CAMPUSwhileaccessingthefollowing websites.Onewebsiteisofanewschannelandtheotheroneisawebsiteforlivestreaming.Thestudentsare requiredtocapturepacketsofmultipleimagesfromthenewschannelwebsiteandcapturepacketsfromthe livestreamwebsitewhilestreamingfor10minutesonceatCAMPUSinagroupandthenontheirhomenetwork individually.Soattheendtherewillbesixtracefiles,threeforeachwebsite,twocapturedonMITnetwork andfouronstudents’homenetworks.
The websites to access are: http:// iview.abc.net.au
ThecompletereportmustbesubmittedonMoodlewithinduedate.Thereporthasfollowingfourmain parts:
Part 1:
ThefirstpartofthereportshouldbeaboutgeneralstatisticsofallsixcapturesusingWiresharkthatmust include:
- Start time ofcapture
- Totalnumberofcapturedpacketsforeachprotocol
- TotalNumberoflostpackets
- IPaddressesoftheclientandserver
Part 2:
Thesecondpartofthereportmustincludescreenshotsofpacketcapture,screenshotsofdifferentstatistics fromWiresharkandcompleteanalysisofthosescreenshotsforbothwebsitesforallthreenetworks.Only screenshotsofthegraphsorotherstatisticswillnotgetanymarksasthosemustbeanalysedindetailto discussthequalityofserviceforaparticularapplication.Thestudentsarerequiredtoanalysethenetwork performancefortheassignedwebsitesconsideringfollowingaspects:
- Throughput
- Round TripTime
- PacketLoss
Whilecollectingstatisticspleasemakesure,youarelookingattherightflowasyourWiresharkfilemayhave packetsfromotherapplicationsandflowsaswell.Figure1onnextpageshowsthethroughputgraph generatedbyWiresharkandsourceanddestinationaddressesareclearlyshown.Youneedtocollectstatistics forflowswhicharefromservertoclient.
Figure 1: Throughput Graph showing source and destination IP addresses
To see the Packet loss you need to enter the following filter in Wireshark:
tcp.analysis.lost_Segment
Part 3:
The third part of the report is about comparing the collected Wireshark statistics of the two different networkedapplicationsonthreedifferentnetworks.ThethroughputgraphsandTCPretransmissionstatistics forwebpagetransferandlivestreaming(providedinpart2)needtobecomparedwitheachotherandforall threenetworks.Thedifferencesoftheperformancetobeidentifiedandreasonsmustbeprovidedforsuch differences.
Part 4:
Studentsneedtodownload,install,useandcompareanotherfreenetworkperformancemeasurementtool from the Internet on their home computer. One possible option is Microsoft Message Analyzer from Thetoolshouldbeusedtoanalysethe networktrafficcapturedwhileaccessingoneofthenewswebsitesmentionedinTable1.Thechosentool shouldbecomparedwithWiresharkonthebasisoffollowingcriteria:
- Easeofaccessanduse:howeasyitistodownload,installandstartusing(anychangestobemade )ascomparedtoWireshark
- GUI:CompareatleastfourGUIfeaturesofthechosentoolwithWireshark
- Visualisationoftraffic:Aftercapturingpacketsbythechosentooltheeffectivenessofthe
- Statisticsgeneration:Atleastonestatisticslikethroughput,RTTetc.needstobegeneratedbythe
Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper
Thecomparisonmustincludescreenshotsforbothtools(yourchosentoolandWireshark)tojudgethevalidityofthecomparison.
Marking criteria:
| Section to be included in
the report |
Description of the section | Marks |
| Introduction | Outline of the assignment Overallstructureofthereport | 4 |
| General Statistics | For each capture following should be discussed:
1. Time ofcapture 2. Totalnumberofcapturedpackets 3. IPaddressesofclientandserver |
9 |
| Network Performance | Screenshots and analysis of the following:
1. Throughput 2. Round TripTime 3. PacketLoss |
5 x 3 = 15 |
| Comparison 1 | ComparisonofthethroughputandTCPretransmissions ofbothapplicationsonthreenetworksanddiscussionof thereasonsforthedifference. | 5 x 3 = 15 |
| Comparison 2 | ComparisonofthechosentoolwithWiresharkinterms of:
1. Easeofaccessanduser 2. GUI 3. Visualisation oftraffic 4. Statisticsgeneration The screenshots for both tools should be provided |
3 x 4 = 12 |
| Conclusion | Completesummaryofthereportspeciallythe comparison. | 3 |
| Reference style | Follow IEEE reference style. | 2 |
| Total | 60 |
Marking Rubric for Assignment #2: Total Marks 60
| Grade Mark | HD
> 80% |
DI 70-79% | CR 60-69% | P
50-59% |
Fail
< 50% |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Introduction
/4 |
Clear and concise outline is provided, report structure is described properly | Clear outline is provided, report structure is described. | Some outline is provided, report structure is somewhat
discussed |
Some outline is provided,. | This is no relevance to the assignment topic. |
| General Statistics
/9 |
All required aspects are discussed exceptionally well | Allrequired aspects are discussed | Some aspects are discussed | Very few aspects are discussed | Not related |
| Network Performance
/15 |
All required matters are analysed in detail and exceptionally well, All screen shots are clear and complete | Most of the required matters are analysed in detail , All screen shots are clear and complete N | Some required matters are analysedindetail and , Some screen shots are clearand
complete |
Few of the required matters are analysed | Not related or/and incomplete |
| Comparison 1
/15 |
In detail comparison is provided and justification is given exceptionally well | Some comparison is provided and justification given | Some comparison is provided and incomplete justification is
there |
Comparison and justification is incomplete | Not related and/or incomplete |
| Comparison 2
/12 |
In detail comparison is provided and justification is given exceptionally well | Some comparison is provided and justification given | Some comparison is provided and incomplete justification is
there |
Comparison and justification is incomplete | Not related and/or incomplete |
| Conclusion
/3 |
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments | Consistency logical and convincing | Mostly consistent logical and convincing Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper | Adequate cohesion and conviction | Argument is confused and disjointed |
| Reference style
/2 |
Clear styles with excellent source of references. | Clear referencing style | Generally good referencing style | Sometimes clear referencing style | Lacks consistency with many errors |
Network Analysis using Wireshark Assignment Paper