Assignment Psychology 650

Version:1.0 StartHTML:000000249 EndHTML:000009637 StartFragment:000004864 EndFragment:000009557 StartSelection:000004864 EndSelection:000009547 SourceURL:https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/12237/assignments/238910?module_item_id=617655     Week 3 – Assignment                  //<![CDATA[  !function(){   var o,s,v;   if (!(window.Promise && Object.assign && Object.values && [].find && [].includes && (o={},s=Symbol(),v={},o[s]=v,o[s]===v) && (function f(){}).bind().name===’bound f’)) {     s = ‘s’, document.write(‘<‘+s+’cr’+’ipt src=”https://du11hjcvx0uqb.cloudfront.net/dist/ie11-polyfill-9524c2cc43.js”></’+s+’c’+’ript>’);   } }();        //]]>           function _earlyClick(e){       var c = e.target       while (c && c.ownerDocument) {         if (c.getAttribute(‘href’) == ‘#’ || c.getAttribute(‘data-method’)) {           e.preventDefault()           (_earlyClick.clicks = _earlyClick.clicks || []).push(c)           break         }         c = c.parentNode       }     }     document.addEventListener(‘click’, _earlyClick)

Case Analysis – Collaborating with Outside Providers Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the  and Case 9: Bulimia Nervosa in Gorenstein and Comer (2014). Please also read the Waller, Gray, Hinrichsen, Mounford, Lawson, and Patient (2014) “Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa and Atypical Bulimic Nervosa: Effectiveness in Clinical Settings,”Halmi (2013) “Perplexities of Treatment Resistance in Eating Disorders,” and DeJesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration Between Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Treatment of Eating Disorders” articles.Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study. In your paper, please include the following.Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Heston and the treatment intervention plans utilized in the case.Describe the cognitive-behavioral model of the maintenance of bulimia nervosa.Explain why Rita was reluctant to participate in Dr. Heston’s request for her to keep a record of her eating behaviors. Use information from the Halmi (2013) article “Perplexities of Treatment Resistance in Eating Disorders” to help support your statements.Recommend outside providers (psychiatrists, medical doctors, nutritionists, social workers, holistic practitioners, etc.) to the assist Rita in achieving her treatment goals. Use information from the DeJesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration between Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Treatment of Eating Disorders” article to help support your recommendations.Describe some of the challenges and ethical issues that Dr. Heston may encounter when working collaboratively with the professionals that you recommended.  Apply ethical principles and standards of psychology relevant to your description of Dr. Heston’s potential collaboration with outside providers.

Permalink:  ‎

Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Heston, supporting your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library.Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. The recommended articles for this week may be useful in generating your response to this criterion. Justify your selections with information from the case.The Case Analysis – Collaborating with Outside ProvidersMust be 4 to 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the .Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust use at least two peer-reviewed sources from in the Ashford UVersion:1.0 StartHTML:000000249 EndHTML:000009637 StartFragment:000004864 EndFragment:000009557 StartSelection:000004864 EndSelection:000009547 SourceURL:https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/12237/assignments/238910?module_item_id=617655     Week 3 – Assignment                  //<![CDATA[  !function(){   var o,s,v;   if (!(window.Promise && Object.assign && Object.values && [].find && [].includes && (o={},s=Symbol(),v={},o[s]=v,o[s]===v) && (function f(){}).bind().name===’bound f’)) {     s = ‘s’, document.write(‘<‘+s+’cr’+’ipt src=”https://du11hjcvx0uqb.cloudfront.net/dist/ie11-polyfill-9524c2cc43.js”></’+s+’c’+’ript>’);   } }();        //]]>           function _earlyClick(e){       var c = e.target       while (c && c.ownerDocument) {         if (c.getAttribute(‘href’) == ‘#’ || c.getAttribute(‘data-method’)) {           e.preventDefault()           (_earlyClick.clicks = _earlyClick.clicks || []).push(c)           break         }         c = c.parentNode       }     }     document.addEventListener(‘click’, _earlyClick)

Case Analysis – Collaborating with Outside Providers Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the  and Case 9: Bulimia Nervosa in Gorenstein and Comer (2014). Please also read the Waller, Gray, Hinrichsen, Mounford, Lawson, and Patient (2014) “Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa and Atypical Bulimic Nervosa: Effectiveness in Clinical Settings,”Halmi (2013) “Perplexities of Treatment Resistance in Eating Disorders,” and DeJesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration Between Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Treatment of Eating Disorders” articles.Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study. In your paper, please include the following.Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Heston and the treatment intervention plans utilized in the case.Describe the cognitive-behavioral model of the maintenance of bulimia nervosa. Explain why Rita was reluctant to participate in Dr. Heston™s request for her to keep a record of her eating behaviors. Use information from the Halmi (2013) article “Perplexities of Treatment Resistance in Eating Disorders to help support your statements.Recommend outside providers (psychiatrists, medical doctors, nutritionists, social workers, holistic practitioners, etc.) to the assist Rita in achieving her treatment goals. Use information from the DE Jesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration between Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Treatment of Eating Disorders€ article to help support your recommendations. Describe some of the challenges and ethical issues that Dr. Heston may encounter when working collaboratively with the professionals that you recommended.  Apply ethical principles and standards of psychology relevant to your description of Dr. Heston™s potential collaboration with outside providers. Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Heston, supporting your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library. Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. The recommended articles for this week may be useful in generating your response to this criterion. Justify your selections with information from the case. The Case Analysis – Collaborating with Outside Providers Must be 4 to 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the .Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student as name Course name and numberInstructor’s name Date submitted Must use at least two peer-reviewed sources from in the Ashford University Library. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.University Library. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Assignment Psychology 650

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet My Deadline

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

• Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
• Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
• One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
• I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

• Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
• In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
• Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
• Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

• Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
• Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
• I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

• I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
• As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
• It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

• For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
• Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
• Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
• Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

• The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
• Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
• If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
• I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
• As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

• Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
  • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
  • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Assignment Psychology 650