Assignment: multidisciplinary collaboration in pediatric primary care practice
Assignment: multidisciplinary collaboration in pediatric primary care practice
Question description
Assignment: Collaboration paper
multidisciplinary collaboration in pediatric primary care practice: This Assignment is specific to a particular pediatric primary care practice and is mostly based upon student observation and experience. This should be a formal paper and should be 5 pages in length (excluding title page and reference page). You must use APA formatting including header, title page, content, in-text citations, and reference page.
Permalink:
For full points the following must be addressed adequately in your paper:
- From your observations and experiences in your pediatric clinical rotation, provide an example of multidisciplinary collaboration.
- From your observations and experiences in your pediatric clinical rotation, provide an example of how multidisciplinary and family collaboration affects patient outcomes.
- Discuss how you have been able to promote communication and collaboration among health care professionals, patients, and family/caregivers.
- Discuss a particular case where collaboration among health care professionals and family members affected patient/family satisfaction.
- In your clinical practicum, what are some barriers that you have observed to collaboration among health care professionals, patients, and families?
Assignment: multidisciplinary collaboration in pediatric primary care practice
Your writing Assignment should:
-
- follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)
- be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
- display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and
- use APA 6th edition formatting.
multidisciplinary collaboration in pediatric primary care practice sample
Assignment: multidisciplinary collaboration in pediatric primary care practice
Although few frameworks exist to enhance interdisciplinary or rather multidisciplinary collaboration, whose outcome would be improved and effective communication, it is very vital in clinical practice (VanWormer, Lindquist, Robiner, & Finkelstein, 2012). Multidisciplinary collaboration limits adverse effects add to patients through improvement of outcomes and enhances health care practitioners and another employee satisfaction (Epstein, 2014). During the pediatric clinical rotation, a 10-year-old boy was presented with a case of acute exacerbation of asthma. The boy had difficulties breathing, even with the inhaler while at the field, where he was playing with his classmates. The boy was brought in by summer camp people, which had tried to stabilize him, and although he still seemed to have difficulties breathing, he had somewhat improved. The primary care provider and his assistant examined him, and the findings showed that his respiratory rate was 35 breaths/min and the hear rate was 96 beats/min, the temperature was 97.8 °C, there was diffuse wheezing in all the fields of the lungs and nasal flaring. The boy had 8-year history of asthma and had broken the routine intake of his medication after his parents separated. Nevertheless, a few minutes later both parents arrived at the clinic and seemed to have set aside their differences to pay attention on the well being of their son. At this point, oxygen was being administered with a reservoir mask and the primary care physician ordered that the boy be treated with multiple nebulizer treatments with Albuterol for every 20 minutes for one hour.
Essentially, this was a case where multidisciplinary and family collaboration was demonstrated, because although the parents were separated and somehow had contributing in causing the problem because of the break in routine over the boy’s medication, each had brought with them the boy’s medication that were in their separate houses. This made it easier for the health care practitioners to examine the medication and establish the root case of the problem. From the laboratory tests that were carried out, it was established that the boy’s body was not responding as expected to the drugs from his father’s house, which had just been refilled, because they were not the same drugs that the boy had been using previously. The father admitted that he had purchased the drugs over the counter through a friend, who was a medical practitioner and was not aware that the boy would not develop side effects that would end up worsening his health condition, asthma. Inherently, the fact that the parents despite their issues had come together for the sake of their son and provided all the necessary health information made the treatment process very easy and within a period of two days of hospitalization, the boy had recovery and was released from the hospital.